New rule

I will no longer engage those whose opinions are based entirely on faith in debate about those opinions. I’m afraid that one of these days my head will explode. I’ll supply or lead to information where I can, when someone might actually be interested in real actual truly true facts of truth. But that’s it. Faith is irrational. How is science supposed to compete with that! Facts that just exist on their own!? Amazing!

(Real actual quote, well, er… paraphrase that I encountered recently: “If one so much as suggests that [insert batshit insane claim here] is true without proof that can only be supplied by [insert Evil organization that is covering it up and will therefore never supply that proof], accusations fly of paranoia.”

Yeah, you are indeed being a little bit fucking loony there. How the hell do you argue with crap like this! Where to even begin!? You can’t get proof, but that’s okay, you’re right anyway!? Guh? You’re admitting that you’re full of shit, and that being full of shit is essential to your cause!? And that everyone else is wrongfully accusing you of paranoia because they don’t believe you anyway, despite the fact that you’re admitting that you do not now, and will never have proof? This is where greymatter starts leaking from my ears.)

As far as I can remember, I’ve been a skeptic. I therefore do not have any insight into how one might escape from lunacy. But experience teaches me that no amount of logic can convince someone who is completely dedicated to believing something, no matter how irrational. So no more wasting my time. Ugh.

This leaves me with a problem. How the hell do I escape from conversations initiated by someone else, while defending the honor of Critical Thinking? Won’t it look like complete and utter crap must be true, if I refuse to come up with an argument against it?

And how in the hell do I get people to quit comparing me to a Vulcan. Damn it, I can’t help it if they’re illogical. And it’s just not in my nature to sit there and let them be highly illogical in my vicinity.

Unless I’ve been drinking. If I’ve been drinking, I will gladly participate in some nutty nutjobbery. I’ll be mocking the other participants in my head, but still. It’s an entertaining stretch of the imagination. Damn, the imaginations of some of these kooks make me feel so inferior. Stretched so far that they’re in danger of bursting!

(Let’s see if I hold myself to all of this. Some of these people are just so maddening. I’m not sure if I mean that in the sense that it makes me angry, or the sense that it makes me crazy.)

Maybe instead of instant gratification…

…NASA actually wants to wait for the dust to clear, and to have some time to analyze data before releasing results. You fucking loon!

I am so satisfied. Look’s like Hoagland’s blog is starting out, at least, to be all that I hoped for. Regularly updated psychoceramics. A laugh and a half, on a more regular basis. Hopefully someone else will catch onto this stuff and become active in debunking it. I don’t have nearly enough knowledge of astronomy to do so, but geez, even I know obvious complete and utter crap when I see it. Then again, I’m really not sure why anyone bothers with this guy at all anymore. He’s such a freakin’ loon… I can’t even convince myself 100% that he’s not joking…

(P.S. Hoagland brings that “dirty snowball” crap up yet again. Read this for additional bullshit, and read this for a little bit of sanity.)

(And P.S. — XMM-Newton detects water on Tempel 1)

Old Negativesmart posts up

I just realized that a lot of my old posts from way way back when (as early as April 2000!) are still lurking around on Blogger. I guess I imported them, like, years ago! I picked one of the no-effort templates and republished the whole thing. If you’re interested in ancient history, the posts are up at negativesmart.blogspot.com. I wish I had even older archives, but there wasn’t really much blogging software at the time, y’know. I did it all by hand, and lots of it is probably lost for good, if the Wayback Machine doesn’t have it. Other bits from my post-Blogger days are lost, too (remember when my hard drive died AND my hosting ate everything in the same week? Grr!) I think I’m going to look around on some of the old CDs I have and see what I can find, though.

I couldn’t resist…

Bush’s Subliminal 9/11 Backdrop?, taken from Alex Jones’ Infowars mailing list:

This one has even got me “creeped out.” I feel like I need new foil for my hat, but it just seems too clear to be a coincidence.

Look at this picture of Jr.’s speech and tell me what you see:

Oh noes!

Then ask yourself, why are those two flags folded in such an unusual manner?

This is what I see: Two towers, one on each side of Bush. AND, if you think of the blue field of each flag as the top of a “9” (with the red stripe at the bottom right hand corner of the blue field as the bottom of the “9”) and each red stripe to the right of the field as “1”s – they clearly say “9/11.”

As Jr. himself once said, “here’s no need to get subliminable about this . . .”

Here is my response:

What a fucking joke!

More spacey stuff

Spectacular Conjunction

This weekend Mercury, Venus and Saturn are going to crowd together in a patch of sky no bigger than your thumb. Astronomers call it a “conjunction” and it’s going to be spectacular.

And possibly visible to me, for once. The weather predicts that the skies will be clear around these parts this weekend.

Cosmos1 Video Feed

A live feed of Cosmos1 (ya know, the super keen solar sail spacecraft they just launched from a submarine in Russia, yada yada) will be available whenever it crosses over the Clay Center Observatory in Massachusetts via the Cosmos1 Video Site. If you’re interested, first feed should be: Thursday, June 23rd between 21:00:00 – 22:00:00 EDT.

[edit] Except that they apparently don’t know where the thing is… I just read that the solar sail may be lost in space. I hope they find it (in working condition)! [/edit]

No paradox for time travellers

New Scientist Breaking News – No paradox for time travellers

Some solutions to the equations of Einstein’s general theory of relativity lead to situations in which space-time curves back on itself, theoretically allowing travellers to loop back in time and meet younger versions of themselves. Because such time travel sets up paradoxes, many researchers suspect that some physical constraints must make time travel impossible. Now, physicists Daniel Greenberger of the City University of New York and Karl Svozil of the Vienna University of Technology in Austria have shown that the most basic features of quantum theory may ensure that time travellers could never alter the past, even if they are able to go back in time.

I don’t know much of anything about quantum physics, but I always just kind of liked to think that if you could go back in time, obviously you wouldn’t be able to change anything. If you went back in time and killed your parents, you would never be born, so duh… you can’t do it! Now there is some model of quantum mechanics that might explain this, but I’m not going to pretend to understand it.