Comments on: Annoying poster for annoying movie http://www.negativesmart.com/2008/05/31/annoying-poster-for-annoying-movie/ Vehemently opposed to margarine. Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:49:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Candice http://www.negativesmart.com/2008/05/31/annoying-poster-for-annoying-movie/#comment-1180 Candice Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:48:16 +0000 http://www.negativesmart.com/2008/05/31/annoying-poster-for-annoying-movie/#comment-1180 Honestly, I doubt they bothered trying to come up with a photo that would generate interest in the movie. The audience was guaranteed, just because the movie existed, the end. Ugh. And um. WHAT!? I don't see anything in that poster that would prevent me from assuming those ladies were all subjects of "What Not to Wear". Especially SJP. What the FUCK kind of outfit is that!? Wasn't this shit designed to make me buy stuff? Um, okay. Maybe if I was part of the bingo-card-daubing-in-Vegas crowd. SJP is only missing... CLOWN MAKEUP. Srsly now. Honestly, I doubt they bothered trying to come up with a photo that would generate interest in the movie. The audience was guaranteed, just because the movie existed, the end. Ugh. And um. WHAT!? I don’t see anything in that poster that would prevent me from assuming those ladies were all subjects of “What Not to Wear”. Especially SJP. What the FUCK kind of outfit is that!? Wasn’t this shit designed to make me buy stuff? Um, okay. Maybe if I was part of the bingo-card-daubing-in-Vegas crowd. SJP is only missing… CLOWN MAKEUP. Srsly now.

]]> By: Mr. Wisdumb http://www.negativesmart.com/2008/05/31/annoying-poster-for-annoying-movie/#comment-1173 Mr. Wisdumb Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:19:27 +0000 http://www.negativesmart.com/2008/05/31/annoying-poster-for-annoying-movie/#comment-1173 I would be upset if I was the hot/sexy/pretty Kristin Davis and had the name (without the benefit of any of the previously used adjectives) SJP name on my photo. Especially if I was aware of the majority of commentary used to describe SJP. Also, why use a photo where none of the subjects are even looking towards the camera? Instead of them looking towards the viewer (to engage them in the shot) or towards the title or release date of the film, they are looking off to the right. This poster doesn't generate interest in the film for me, it just makes me wonder what is so interesting to the right. A slick guerilla marketing group should start placing posters or other billboards just to the right of the SITC posters. I would be upset if I was the hot/sexy/pretty Kristin Davis and had the name (without the benefit of any of the previously used adjectives) SJP name on my photo. Especially if I was aware of the majority of commentary used to describe SJP.

Also, why use a photo where none of the subjects are even looking towards the camera? Instead of them looking towards the viewer (to engage them in the shot) or towards the title or release date of the film, they are looking off to the right. This poster doesn’t generate interest in the film for me, it just makes me wonder what is so interesting to the right. A slick guerilla marketing group should start placing posters or other billboards just to the right of the SITC posters.

]]> By: exarch http://www.negativesmart.com/2008/05/31/annoying-poster-for-annoying-movie/#comment-1172 exarch Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:34:31 +0000 http://www.negativesmart.com/2008/05/31/annoying-poster-for-annoying-movie/#comment-1172 You've paid more attention to that poster than I did. You’ve paid more attention to that poster than I did.

]]> By: Zap! http://www.negativesmart.com/2008/05/31/annoying-poster-for-annoying-movie/#comment-1171 Zap! Mon, 02 Jun 2008 06:20:14 +0000 http://www.negativesmart.com/2008/05/31/annoying-poster-for-annoying-movie/#comment-1171 Sarah Jessica Parker is such a sexy brunette. Sarah Jessica Parker is such a sexy brunette.

]]>